JN0-664덤프문제집, JN0-664퍼펙트최신버전공부자료

Itexamdump의 인지도는 고객님께서 상상하는것보다 훨씬 높습니다.많은 분들이Itexamdump의 덤프공부가이드로 IT자격증 취득의 꿈을 이루었습니다. Itexamdump에서 출시한 Juniper인증 JN0-664덤프는 IT인사들이 자격증 취득의 험난한 길에서 없어서는 안될중요한 존재입니다. Itexamdump의 Juniper인증 JN0-664덤프를 한번 믿고 가보세요.시험불합격시 덤프비용은 환불해드리니 밑져봐야 본전 아니겠습니까?

성공으로 향하는 길에는 많은 방법과 방식이 있습니다. Juniper인증 JN0-664시험을 패스하는 길에는Itexamdump의Juniper인증 JN0-664덤프가 있습니다. Itexamdump의Juniper인증 JN0-664덤프는 실제시험 출제방향에 초점을 두어 연구제작한 시험준비공부자료로서 높은 시험적중율과 시험패스율을 자랑합니다.국제적으로 승인해주는 IT자격증을 취득하시면 취직 혹은 승진이 쉬워집니다.

>> JN0-664덤프문제집 <<

높은 통과율 JN0-664덤프문제집 인증시험공부

Juniper 인증 JN0-664시험에 도전해보려고 결정하셨다면 Itexamdump덤프공부가이드를추천해드립니다. Itexamdump덤프는 고객님께서 필요한것이 무엇인지 너무나도 잘 알고 있답니다. Itexamdump의 Juniper 인증 JN0-664덤프는Juniper 인증 JN0-664시험을 쉽게 만듭니다.

준이퍼 JN0-664 시험을 통과하는 것은 모든 네트워킹 전문가에게 중요한 성취입니다. 이 자격증은 후보자의 서비스 제공자 네트워크를 설계, 구현 및 지원할 수 있는 능력을 증명합니다. 이 자격증은 또한 후보자의 네트워킹 분야의 기술과 전문성을 인정합니다. 준이퍼 JN0-664 자격증은 산업에서 높은 존중을 받으며 전 세계의 많은 주요 서비스 제공자에서 인정합니다. JN0-664 자격증을 획득하면 후보자는 경력 기회를 확장하고 수익성을 높일 수 있습니다.

최신 JNCIP-SP JN0-664 무료샘플문제 (Q85-Q90):

질문 # 85
Exhibit

Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are true? (Choose two.)

A. This route is learned through EBGP
B. This is an EVPN Type-2 route.
C. The devices advertising this route into EVPN are 10 0 2 12 and 10.0.2.22.
D. The device advertising this route into EVPN is 192.168.101.5.

정답：B,D

설명：
This is an EVPN Type-2 route, also called a MAC/IP advertisement route, that is used to advertise host IP and MAC address information to other VTEPs in an EVPN network. The route type field in the EVPN NLRI has a value of 2, indicating a Type-2 route. The device advertising this route into EVPN is 192.168.101.5, which is the IP address of the VTEP that learned the host information from the local CE device. This IP address is carried in the MPLS label field of the route as part of the VXLAN encapsulation.

질문 # 86
When building an interprovider VPN. you notice on the PE router that you have hidden routes which are received from your BGP peer with family inet labeled-unicast configured.
Which parameter must you configure to solve this problem?

A. Under the family inet labeled-unicast hierarchy, add the explicit null parameter.
B. Under the protocols mpls hierarchy, add the traffic-engineering parameter.
C. Under the protocols ospf hierarchy, add the traffic-engineering parameter.
D. Under the family inet labeled-unicast hierarchy, add the resolve-vpn parameter.

정답：D

질문 # 87
Exhibit.

Referring to the exhibit; the 10.0.0.0/24 EBGP route is received on R5; however, the route is being hidden.
What are two solutions that will solve this problem? (Choose two.)

A. Add the internal interface prefix to the BGP routing tables.
B. On R4, create a policy to change the BGP next hop to itself and apply it to IBGP as an export policy
C. On R4, create a policy to change the BGP next hop to 172.16.1.1 and apply it to IBGP as an export policy
D. Add the external interface prefix to the IGP routing tables

정답：B,D

설명：
the default behavior for iBGP is to propagate EBGP-learned prefixes without changing the next-hop. This can cause issues if the next-hop is not reachable via the IGP. One solution is to use the next-hop self command on R4, which will change the next-hop attribute to its own loopback address. This way, R5 can reach the next-hop via the IGP and install the route in its routing table.
Another solution is to add the external interface prefix (120.0.4.16/30) to the IGP routing tables of R4 and R5.
This will also make the next-hop reachable via the IGP and allow R5 to use the route. According to 2, this is a possible workaround for a pure IP network, but it may not work well for an MPLS network.
The reason why the route is being hidden is that R5 cannot reach the BGP next hop 10.0.0.1, which is the address of R1. R5 does not have a route to 10.0.0.0/24 in its routing table, and neither does R4. Therefore, R5 cannot resolve the BGP next hop and marks the route as hidden.
There are two solutions that will solve this problem:
Option A: On R4, create a policy to change the BGP next hop to itself and apply it to IBGP as an export policy. This way, R5 will receive the route with a next hop of 172.16.1.2, which is reachable via the IGP. This solution is also known as next-hop-self1.
Option B: Add the external interface prefix to the IGP routing tables. This way, R4 and R5 will learn a route to 10.0.0.0/24 via the IGP and be able to resolve the BGP next hop. This solution is also known as recursive lookup2.
Option C is not correct because adding the internal interface prefix to the BGP routing tables will not help R5 reach the BGP next hop 10.0.0.1.
Option D is not correct because changing the BGP next hop to 172.16.1.1 on R4 will not help R5 either, since R5 does not have a route to 172.16.1.1 in its routing table.
References: 1: Configuring Next-Hop-Self for IBGP Peers 2: Understanding Recursive Lookup

질문 # 88
Exhibit

You are running a service provider network and must transport a customer's IPv6 traffic across your IPv4-based MPLS network using BGP You have already configured mpis ipv6-tunneling on your PE routers.
Which two statements are correct about the BGP configuration in this scenario? (Choose two.)

A. You must configure family inet6 unicast between PE routers
B. You must configure family inet6 add-path between PE and CE routers.
C. You must configure family inet6 labcled-unicast between PE routers.
D. You must configure family inet6 unicaat between PE and CE routers.

정답：C,D

설명：
To transport IPv6 traffic over an IPv4-based MPLS network using BGP, you need to configure two address families: family inet6 labeled-unicast and family inet6 unicast. The former is used to exchange IPv6 routes with MPLS labels between PE routers, and the latter is used to exchange IPv6 routes without labels between PE and CE routers. The mpis ipv6-tunneling command enables the PE routers to encapsulate the IPv6 packets with an MPLS label stack and an IPv4 header before sending them over the MPLS network.

질문 # 89
Exhibit

You are troubleshooting the connection between AS 64496 and AS 64497 and notice that only one of the paths is being used for traffic forwarding.
Referring to the exhibit, which three actions will ensure that R1 is configured properly for load balancing BGP routes? (Choose three.)

A. Verify that the multipath option is configured under protocols bgp on both R2 and R3.
B. Verify that the multipath option is configured under protocols bgp on R1.
C. Verify that an import load balancing policy exists under protocols bgp for the received BGP routes on R1.
D. Verify that there is a load balancing export policy under routing-options for the received BGP routes on R1.
E. Verify that the routing table on R1 has BGP routes for 203.0.113.128/25 with multiple next hops.

정답：B,D,E

설명：
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/bgp/topics/topic-map/load-balancing-bgp- session.html

질문 # 90
......

제일 빠른 시일내에 제일 간단한 방법으로Juniper인증 JN0-664시험을 패스하는 방법이 없냐구요? Itexamdump의Juniper인증 JN0-664덤프를 공부하시면 가능합니다. Itexamdump의Juniper인증 JN0-664덤프는 많은 분들이 검증한 가장 유력한Juniper인증 JN0-664시험공부자료입니다. 덤프의 문제만 기억하시면 패스는 문제없기에 제일 빠른 시일내에 시험을 패스하여 자격증 취득이 가능합니다.

JN0-664퍼펙트 최신버전 공부자료: https://www.itexamdump.com/JN0-664.html

Juniper인증 JN0-664시험을 패스하는 길에는Itexamdump의Juniper인증 JN0-664덤프가 있습니다, Itexamdump JN0-664퍼펙트 최신버전 공부자료에서는 모든 IT인증시험에 대비한 고품질 시험공부가이드를 제공해드립니다, 저희 사이트에는Juniper JN0-664 시험의 가장 최신 기출문제와 예상문제를 포함하고 있는 Juniper JN0-664덤프자료를 제공해드립니다.덤프에 있는 문제와 답을 완벽하게 기억하시면 가장 빠른 시일내에 가장 적은 투자로 자격증 취득이 가능합니다, Juniper JN0-664덤프문제집 많은 분들이 우리사이트의 it인증덤프를 사용함으로 관련it시험을 안전하게 패스를 하였습니다.

가운데 프리실라와 준호가 위치했고 빌은 후방으로 빠졌다, 만나봐야 가슴만 찢어진다, Juniper인증 JN0-664시험을 패스하는 길에는Itexamdump의Juniper인증 JN0-664덤프가 있습니다, Itexamdump에서는 모든 IT인증시험에 대비한 고품질 시험공부가이드를 제공해드립니다.

시험패스에 유효한 JN0-664덤프문제집 덤프자료

저희 사이트에는Juniper JN0-664 시험의 가장 최신 기출문제와 예상문제를 포함하고 있는 Juniper JN0-664덤프자료를 제공해드립니다.덤프에 있는 문제와 답을 완벽하게 기억하시면 가장 빠른 시일내에 가장 적은 투자로 자격증 취득이 가능합니다.

많은 분들이 우리사이트의 it인증덤프를 사JN0-664용함으로 관련it시험을 안전하게 패스를 하였습니다, 일년무료 업데이트 서비스 제공.