PSE-Strata-Pro-24 aktueller Test, Test VCE-Dumps für Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall

Man soll stets Maßnahmen für Erfolg, sondern keine Ausreden für Misserfog finden. Die Schulungsunterlagen zur Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Zertifizierungsprüfung von ZertFragen enthalten Testaufgaben und Antworten, die von unseren erfahrenen IT-Experten durch ihre ständige Praxis und Erforschung entworfen sind. Sie verfügen über hohe Genauigkeit und große Reichweite. Sie werden Ihr bester Helfer sein, während Sie die Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Zertifizierungsprüfung vorbereiten.

Jeder in der IT-Branche hat seinen eigenen Traum: das Zertifikat von Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 zu erhalten, berufliche Beförderung oder Gehaltserhöhung zu bekommen. Traum unseres ZertFragen ist es, Ihnen dabei zu helfen, die Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Zertifizierungsprüfung zu bestehen. Nachdem Sie unsere Schulungsunterlagen gekauft haben, können Sie einjährige Aktualisierung kostenlos genießen. Falls Sie die PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Prüfung leider nicht bestehen, versprechen wir Ihnen eine volle Rückerstattung.

>> PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Prüfungs <<

PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Musterprüfungsfragen - PSE-Strata-Pro-24Zertifizierung & PSE-Strata-Pro-24Testfagen

Fragenkataloge zur Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Zertifizierungsprüfung von ZertFragen sind zutreffender, autoritärer und leichter zu verstehen als die aus anderen Webseiten. Wählen Sie ZertFragen, werden Sie niemals bereuen. Falls Sie noch ein paar Sorgen haben, können Sie einige kostenlosen Testfragen und Antworten als Testvision durch unsere Webseite ZertFragen herunterladen. Nachdem Sie die Fragenkataloge zur Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Zertifizierungsprüfung von ZertFragen gekauft haben, können Sie sicherlich erfolgreich bestehen.

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Prüfungsplan:

Thema	Einzelheiten
Thema 1	Network Security Strategy and Best Practices: This section of the exam measures the skills of Security Strategy Specialists and highlights the importance of the Palo Alto Networks five-step Zero Trust methodology. Candidates must understand how to approach and apply the Zero Trust model effectively while emphasizing best practices to ensure robust network security.
Thema 2	Deployment and Evaluation: This section of the exam measures the skills of Deployment Engineers and focuses on identifying the capabilities of Palo Alto Networks NGFWs. Candidates will evaluate features that protect against both known and unknown threats. They will also explain identity management from a deployment perspective and describe the proof of value (PoV) process, which includes assessing the effectiveness of NGFW solutions.
Thema 3	Business Value and Competitive Differentiators: This section of the exam measures the skills of Technical Business Value Analysts and focuses on identifying the value proposition of Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls (NGFWs). Candidates will assess the technical business benefits of tools like Panorama and SCM. They will also recognize customer-relevant topics and align them with Palo Alto Networks' best solutions. Additionally, understanding Strata’s unique differentiators is a key component of this domain.
Thema 4	Architecture and Planning: This section of the exam measures the skills of Network Architects and emphasizes understanding customer requirements and designing suitable deployment architectures. Candidates must explain Palo Alto Networks' platform networking capabilities in detail and evaluate their suitability for various environments. Handling aspects like system sizing and fine-tuning is also a critical skill assessed in this domain.

Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Prüfungsfragen mit Lösungen (Q18-Q23):

18. Frage
A company has multiple business units, each of which manages its own user directories and identity providers (IdPs) with different domain names. The company's network security team wants to deploy a shared GlobalProtect remote access service for all business units to authenticate users to each business unit's IdP.
Which configuration will enable the network security team to authenticate GlobalProtect users to multiple SAML IdPs?

A. Multiple authentication mode Cloud Identity Engine authentication profile for use on the GlobalProtect portals and gateways
B. Authentication sequence that has multiple authentication profiles using different authentication methods
C. GlobalProtect with multiple authentication profiles for each SAML IdP
D. Multiple Cloud Identity Engine tenants for each business unit

Antwort: C

Begründung:
To configure GlobalProtect to authenticate users from multiple SAML identity providers (IdPs), the correct approach involves creating multiple authentication profiles, one for each IdP. Here's the analysis of each option:
* Option A: GlobalProtect with multiple authentication profiles for each SAML IdP
* GlobalProtect allows configuring multiple SAML authentication profiles, each corresponding to a specific IdP.
* These profiles are associated with the GlobalProtect portal or gateway. When users attempt to authenticate, they can be directed to the appropriate IdP based on their domain or other attributes.
* This is the correct approach to enable authentication for users from multiple IdPs.
* Option B: Multiple authentication mode Cloud Identity Engine authentication profile for use on the GlobalProtect portals and gateways
* The Cloud Identity Engine (CIE) can synchronize identities from multiple directories, but it does not directly support multiple SAML IdPs for a shared GlobalProtect setup.
* This option is not applicable.
* Option C: Authentication sequence that has multiple authentication profiles using different authentication methods
* Authentication sequences allow multiple authentication methods (e.g., LDAP, RADIUS, SAML) to be tried in sequence for the same user, but they are not designed for handling multiple SAML IdPs.
* This option is not appropriate for the scenario.
* Option D: Multiple Cloud Identity Engine tenants for each business unit
* Deploying multiple CIE tenants for each business unit adds unnecessary complexity and is not required for configuring GlobalProtect to authenticate users to multiple SAML IdPs.
* This option is not appropriate.

19. Frage
A systems engineer (SE) successfully demonstrates NGFW managed by Strata Cloud Manager (SCM) to a company. In the resulting planning phase of the proof of value (POV), the CISO requests a test that shows how the security policies are either meeting, or are progressing toward meeting, industry standards such as Critical Security Controls (CSC), and how the company can verify that it is effectively utilizing the functionality purchased.
During the POV testing timeline, how should the SE verify that the POV will meet the CISO's request?

A. Near the end, pull a Security Lifecycle Review (SLR) in the POV and create a report for the customer.
B. At the beginning, use PANhandler golden images that are designed to align to compliance and to turning on the features for the CDSS subscription being tested.
C. At the beginning, work with the customer to create custom dashboards and reports for any information required, so reports can be pulled as needed by the customer.
D. Near the end, the customer pulls information from these SCM dashboards: Best Practices, CDSS Adoption, and NGFW Feature Adoption.

Antwort: C

Begründung:
The SE has demonstrated an NGFW managed by SCM, and the CISO now wants the POV to show progress toward industry standards (e.g., CSC) and verify effective use of purchased features (e.g., CDSS subscriptions like Advanced Threat Prevention). The SE must ensure the POV delivers measurable evidence during the testing timeline. Let's evaluate the options.
Step 1: Understand the CISO's Request
* Industry Standards (e.g., CSC): The Center for Internet Security's Critical Security Controls (e.g., CSC 1: Inventory of Devices, CSC 4: Secure Configuration) require visibility, threat prevention, and policy enforcement, which NGFW and SCM can address.
* Feature Utilization: Confirm that licensed functionalities (e.g., App-ID, Threat Prevention, URL Filtering) are active and effective.
* POV Goal: Provide verifiable progress and utilization metrics within the testing timeline.
Reference: Strata Cloud Manager Overview (docs.paloaltonetworks.com/strata-cloud-manager); CIS Critical Security Controls (www.cisecurity.org/controls).
Step 2: Define SCM Capabilities
Strata Cloud Manager (SCM): A cloud-based management platform for Palo Alto NGFWs, offering dashboards (e.g., Best Practices, Feature Adoption) and custom reporting to monitor security posture, policy compliance, and subscription usage.
Security Lifecycle Review (SLR): A report generated via the Customer Support Portal (not SCM) analyzing traffic logs for security gaps, not real-time POV progress.
Dashboards and Reports: SCM provides prebuilt and customizable views for real-time insights into policy effectiveness and feature adoption.
Reference: SCM Dashboards and Reports (docs.paloaltonetworks.com/strata-cloud-manager/dashboards-and- reports).
Step 3: Evaluate Each Option
A). Near the end, pull a Security Lifecycle Review (SLR) in the POV and create a report for the customer.
Description: The SLR analyzes 7-30 days of traffic logs, providing a retrospective security posture assessment (e.g., threats blocked, policy gaps).
Process: Near POV end, upload logs to the Customer Support Portal (Support > Security Lifecycle Review), generate, and share the report.
Limitations:
SLR is a point-in-time analysis, not a real-time progress tracker during the POV timeline.
Requires post-POV log collection, delaying feedback.
Doesn't directly show feature utilization progress or CSC alignment in SCM.
Fit: Misses the "during the POV timeline" requirement; better for post-POV analysis.
Reference: Security Lifecycle Review Guide (support.paloaltonetworks.com, requires login).
B). At the beginning, work with the customer to create custom dashboards and reports for any information required, so reports can be pulled as needed by the customer.
Description: SCM allows custom dashboards and reports (Monitor > Dashboards or Reports) tailored to metrics like policy compliance (CSC alignment) and feature usage (e.g., Threat Prevention hits).
Process:
At POV start, collaborate with the CISO to define metrics (e.g., "Threats blocked by ATP" for CSC 6, "App- ID usage" for feature adoption).
Configure custom dashboards in SCM (Dashboards > Add Dashboard > Custom).
Set up scheduled or on-demand reports (Reports > Custom Reports).
Enable the customer to monitor progress throughout the POV.
Benefits:
Real-time visibility into policy effectiveness and feature use during the timeline.
Aligns with CSC (e.g., blocked malware events) and shows subscription ROI.
Empowers the customer to verify results independently.
Fit: Meets the CISO's request fully within the POV timeline.
Reference: SCM Custom Dashboards (docs.paloaltonetworks.com/strata-cloud-manager/dashboards-and- reports/custom-dashboards).
C). Near the end, the customer pulls information from these SCM dashboards: Best Practices, CDSS Adoption, and NGFW Feature Adoption.
Description: SCM provides prebuilt dashboards:
Best Practices: Assesses policy alignment with security standards.
CDSS Adoption: Tracks subscription usage (e.g., ATP, URL Filtering).
NGFW Feature Adoption: Monitors features like App-ID or User-ID.
Limitations:
Waiting until "near the end" delays visibility, missing ongoing progress tracking.
Prebuilt dashboards may not fully align with CSC or specific customer needs without customization.
Fit: Useful but incomplete; lacks proactive setup and real-time monitoring throughout the POV.
Reference: SCM Prebuilt Dashboards (docs.paloaltonetworks.com/strata-cloud-manager/dashboards-and- reports/prebuilt-dashboards).
D). At the beginning, use PANhandler golden images that are designed to align to compliance and to turning on the features for the CDSS subscription being tested.
Description: PANhandler is a tool for managing Skillets (configuration templates), including "golden images" for compliance (e.g., NIST, CIS benchmarks).
Process: Apply a Skillet at POV start to configure the NGFW with compliance settings and CDSS features.
Limitations:
Configures the NGFW but doesn't verify progress or utilization during the POV.
No reporting or dashboard integration for the CISO to track results.
Fit: Sets up the environment but doesn't meet the verification requirement.
Reference: PANhandler Skillets (github.com/PaloAltoNetworks/panhandler).
Step 4: Select the Best Approach
B is the strongest choice:
Proactive: Starts at the beginning, ensuring metrics are tracked throughout the POV.
Customizable: Tailors dashboards/reports to CSC (e.g., threat detection for CSC 6) and feature use (e.g., ATP events).
Verifiable: Enables the customer to pull reports as needed, meeting the CISO's request within the timeline.
Why not A, C, or D?
A: SLR is retrospective, not real-time, missing the "during" aspect.
C: Prebuilt dashboards are helpful but delayed and less flexible than custom options.
D: Golden images configure but don't verify progress or utilization.
Step 5: Verification with Palo Alto Documentation
SCM Custom Dashboards: Supports real-time, tailored monitoring (SCM Docs).
SLR: Post-analysis tool, not POV-progressive (Support Portal Docs).
Prebuilt Dashboards: Limited customization (SCM Docs).
PANhandler: Configuration-focused, not reporting-focused (PANhandler Docs).
Thus, the verified answer is B.

20. Frage
What are two methods that a NGFW uses to determine if submitted credentials are valid corporate credentials? (Choose two.)

A. Domain credential filter
B. Group mapping
C. WMI client probing
D. LDAP query

Antwort: A,D

Begründung:
* LDAP Query (Answer B):
* Palo Alto Networks NGFWs can queryLDAP directories(such as Active Directory) to validate whether submitted credentials match the corporate directory.
* Domain Credential Filter (Answer C):
* TheDomain Credential Filterfeature ensures that submitted credentials are checked against valid corporate credentials, preventing credential misuse.
* Why Not A:
* Group mappingis used to identify user groups for policy enforcement but does not validate submitted credentials.
* Why Not D:
* WMI client probingis used for user identification but is not a method for validating submitted credentials.
References from Palo Alto Networks Documentation:
* Credential Theft Prevention

21. Frage
Which two compliance frameworks are included with the Premium version of Strata Cloud Manager (SCM)? (Choose two)

A. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
B. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
C. Payment Card Industry (PCI)
D. Center for Internet Security (CIS)

Antwort: B,C

Begründung:
Step 1: Understanding Strata Cloud Manager (SCM) Premium
Strata Cloud Manager is a unified management interface for Strata NGFWs, Prisma Access, and other Palo Alto Networks solutions. ThePremium version(subscription-based) includes advanced features like:
* AIOps Premium: Predictive analytics, capacity planning, and compliance reporting.
* Compliance Posture Management: Pre-built dashboards and reports for specific regulatory frameworks.
Compliance frameworks in SCM Premium provide visibility into adherence to standards like PCI DSS and NIST, generating actionable insights and audit-ready reports based on firewall configurations, logs, and traffic data.

22. Frage
When a customer needs to understand how Palo Alto Networks NGFWs lower the risk of exploitation by newly announced vulnerabilities known to be actively attacked, which solution and functionality delivers the most value?

A. WildFire loads custom OS images to ensure that the sandboxing catches any activity that would affect the customer's environment.
B. Single Pass Architecture and parallel processing ensure traffic is efficiently scanned against any enabled Cloud-Delivered Security Services (CDSS) subscription.
C. Advanced Threat Prevention's command injection and SQL injection functions use inline deep learning against zero-day threats.
D. Advanced URL Filtering uses machine learning (ML) to learn which malicious URLs are being utilized by the attackers, then block the resulting traffic.

Antwort: C

Begründung:
The most effective way to reduce the risk of exploitation bynewly announced vulnerabilitiesis through Advanced Threat Prevention (ATP). ATP usesinline deep learningto identify and block exploitation attempts, even for zero-day vulnerabilities, in real time.
* Why "Advanced Threat Prevention's command injection and SQL injection functions use inline deep learning against zero-day threats" (Correct Answer B)?Advanced Threat Prevention leverages deep learning modelsdirectly in the data path, which allows it to analyze traffic in real time and detect patterns of exploitation, including newly discovered vulnerabilities being actively exploited in the wild.
It specifically targets advanced tactics like:
* Command injection.
* SQL injection.
* Memory-based exploits.
* Protocol evasion techniques.
This functionality lowers the risk of exploitation byactively blocking attack attemptsbased on their behavior, even when a signature is not yet available. This approach makes ATP the most valuable solution for addressing new and actively exploited vulnerabilities.
* Why not "Advanced URL Filtering uses machine learning (ML) to learn which malicious URLs are being utilized by the attackers, then block the resulting traffic" (Option A)?While Advanced URL Filtering is highly effective at blocking access to malicious websites, it does not provide the inline analysis necessary to prevent direct exploitation of vulnerabilities. Exploitation often happens within the application or protocol layer, which Advanced URL Filtering does not inspect.
* Why not "Single Pass Architecture and parallel processing ensure traffic is efficiently scanned against any enabled Cloud-Delivered Security Services (CDSS) subscription" (Option C)?Single Pass Architecture improves performance by ensuring all enabled services (like Threat Prevention, URL Filtering, etc.) process traffic efficiently. However, it is not a feature that directly addresses vulnerability exploitation or zero-day attack detection.
* Why not "WildFire loads custom OS images to ensure that the sandboxing catches anyactivity that would affect the customer's environment" (Option D)?WildFire is a sandboxing solution designed to detect malicious files and executables. While it is useful for analyzing malware, it does not provide inline protection against exploitation of newly announced vulnerabilities, especially those targeting network protocols or applications.

23. Frage
......

Mit der Entwicklung der IT-Industrie nimmt die Zahl der IT-Lerner seit Jahren immer zu. Das führt zu immer stärkerer Konkurrenzen. Und es ist undenkbar, dass Sie in IT-Industrie von anderen überschritten sind. Deshalb sollen Sie Ihre Fähigkeit ständig erhöhen und Ihre Stärke zu anderen beweisen. Wie können Sie Ihre Fähigkeit zu anderen beweisen? Immer mehr Leute wählen IT-Zertifizierungen, Ihre Fähigkeit zu beweisen. Wollen Sie auch? Kommen Sie zuerst zu Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Zertifizierungsprüfung. Das ist die wichtigste Palo Alto Networks Prüfung und auch von vielen Unternehmen anerkannt.

PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Dumps Deutsch: https://www.zertfragen.com/PSE-Strata-Pro-24_prufung.html