EDGE EDGE-Expertリンクグローバル & EDGE-Expert練習問題集

Topexamは生徒を常に惹きつけ、EDGE熱心な顧客からの世界的なフィードバックの進歩に情熱を移します。EDGE-Expert試験で彼らが夢をかなえるためにこの分野でナンバーワンであることを証明します。 EDGE-Expert試験問題の質の高さを保証しているため、EDGE-Expert練習教材はより優れた教育効果をもたらします。また、学習の後方情報の蓄積が生徒に大きな負担を感じさせる代わりに、最新のEDGE-Expert試験ガイドは、あらゆる種類の生徒の有効性または正確性のニーズを満たすことができます。

成功への道を示す指標として、当社のEDGE-Expert実践教材は、あなたの旅のあらゆる困難を乗り越えるために役立ちます。すべての課題をウォークインのように扱うことはできませんが、EDGE-Expertシミュレーションの実践により、レビューを効果的にすることができます。それが、当社のEDGE-Expert調査問題がプロのモデルである理由です。 98％以上の高い合格率を誇るEDGE-Expert試験問題により、数千万人の受験者が試験に合格しました。

>> EDGE EDGE-Expertリンクグローバル <<

EDGE-Expert練習問題集、EDGE-Expert認定試験

TopexamのEDGE-Expert問題集は素晴らしい参考資料です。この問題集は絶対あなたがずっと探しているものです。これは受験生の皆さんのために特別に作成し出された試験参考書です。この参考書は短い時間で試験に十分に準備させ、そして楽に試験に合格させます。試験のためにあまりの時間と精力を無駄にしたくないなら、TopexamのEDGE-Expert問題集は間違いなくあなたに最もふさわしい選択です。この資料を使用すると、あなたの学習効率を向上させ、多くの時間を節約することができます。

EDGE Excellence in Design for Greater Efficiencies (EDGE Expert) Exam 認定 EDGE-Expert 試験問題 (Q69-Q74):

質問 # 69
During a design audit, an EDGE Auditor notices that the project does not meet the EDGE standard for energy.
Which of the following is an acceptable course of action for the Auditor?

A. Contact the design team directly to work with them to find a solution to improve the energy efficiency performance of the project.
B. As the project does not qualify for EDGE certification, the EDGE Auditor does not have to take any further action on the project.
C. Based on the Auditor's previous experience on working on similar projects, provide a list of measures that the Client could incorporate in the project that will take them comfortably over the EDGE standard.
D. Ask the Client to use the EDGE tool again to identify options that will take the project comfortably over the EDGE standard.

正解：D

解説：
The role of an EDGE Auditor during a design audit (Preliminary Certification stage) is to verify compliance with the EDGE standard, which requires at least 20% savings in energy, water, and embodied energy in materials. If the project does not meet the standard, the Auditor must follow specific protocols without overstepping their role. The EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols outline the acceptable actions: "If a project does not meet the EDGE standard for energy during a design audit, the Auditor should inform the Client of the shortfall and ask them to use the EDGE tool again to identify additional measures that will take the project comfortably over the EDGE standard (e.g., 20% energy savings). The Auditor must not provide design advice or modify the assessment themselves, as their role is to verify, not consult" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 4.1: Audit Process). Option A, ask the Client to use the EDGE tool again to identify options that will take the project comfortably over the EDGE standard, directly aligns with this guidance, as it keeps the Auditor in a verification role while encouraging the Client to revise their design. Option B (contact the design team directly to work with them) is incorrect, as it violates the Auditor's independence: "The Auditor must not engage directly with the design team to improve the project, as this constitutes consultancy, which conflicts with their role as an independent verifier" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.3:
Conflict of Interest). Option C (take no further action) is also incorrect, as the Auditor has a responsibility to report the shortfall: "If a project does not meet the EDGE standard, the Auditor must document the failure in the audit report and inform the Client, rather than abandoning the process" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.2: Audit Requirements). Option D (provide a list of measures based on the Auditor's experience) oversteps the Auditor's role by offering consultancy: "The Auditor cannot provide specific design recommendations or measures, as this compromises their impartiality; they must direct the Client to use the EDGE software or consult an EDGE Expert" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.3: Conflict of Interest). The EDGE User Guide further supports: "During a design audit, the Auditor's role is to assess compliance, not to guide the design process; if the project falls short, the Client should revisit the EDGE tool to explore additional measures, potentially with the help of an EDGE Expert" (EDGE User Guide, Section
6.5: Working with EDGE Auditors). The EDGE Certification Protocol adds: "The Auditor's report should note the energy shortfall and recommend that the Client revise the self-assessment to meet the 20% savings threshold, ensuring the process remains Client-driven" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.2: Audit Requirements). Thus, asking the Client to use the EDGE tool again (Option A) is the acceptable course of action.
Reference:EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 4.1: Audit Process, Section 2.3: Conflict of Interest; EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.2: Audit Requirements; EDGE User Guide Version 2.1, Section 6.5:
Working with EDGE Auditors.

質問 # 70
Coefficient of Performance (COP) of the electrical chiller is defined as:

A. Thermal output / electrical input.
B. Electrical input / thermal output.
C. Thermal output / thermal input.
D. Electrical output / electrical input.

正解：A

解説：
The Coefficient of Performance (COP) is a critical metric in EDGE for assessing the energy efficiency of chillers, a common green building design element. The EDGE Methodology Report defines COP for electrical chillers: "The Coefficient of Performance (COP) of an electrical chiller is defined as the ratio of thermal output (cooling provided, measured in kW) to electrical input (power consumed, measured in kW). A higher COP indicates greater efficiency, as more cooling is produced per unit of electricity" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.1: Energy Efficiency Metrics). Option B, thermal output / electrical input, matches this definition directly. Option A (thermal output / thermal input) is incorrect, as it applies to heat- driven systems like absorption chillers, not electrical ones. Option C (electrical input / thermal output) inverts the ratio, representing the inverse of COP. Option D (electrical output / electrical input) is irrelevant, as chillers produce thermal output, not electrical output. The EDGE User Guide reinforces this: "For air-cooled and water-cooled chillers, COP is calculated as thermal output divided by electrical input to evaluate energy efficiency" (EDGE User Guide, Section 4.2: Energy Efficiency Measures).
Reference:EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.1: Energy Efficiency Metrics; EDGE User Guide Version 2.1, Section 4.2: Energy Efficiency Measures.

質問 # 71
Which of the following describes a more efficient lamp?

A. More lumens/watt
B. Longer life
C. Lower watts/m²
D. Lower wattage

正解：A

解説：
Lamp efficiency in EDGE is a key factor in reducing energy consumption for lighting, a critical green building design strategy. The EDGE User Guide defines lamp efficiency: "In EDGE, a moreefficient lamp is one that provides higher lumens per watt, meaning it produces more light output (lumens) for the same electrical input (watts). This metric, known as luminous efficacy, is used to evaluate lighting efficiency measures like EEM22 - Efficient Lighting for Internal Areas" (EDGE User Guide, Section 4.4: Lighting Efficiency Measures). Option A, more lumens/watt, directly aligns with this definition, as it indicates greater efficiency in converting electricity to light. Option B (lower watts/m²) refers to lighting power density, which is a design metric, not a lamp characteristic: "Watts/m² is a measure of lighting power density for a space, not the efficiency of an individual lamp" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.4: Lighting Calculations). Option C (longer life) relates to durability, not efficiency: "Lamp life affects maintenance costs but is not a direct measure of energy efficiency in EDGE" (EDGE User Guide, Section 4.4: Lighting Efficiency Measures). Option D (lower wattage) alone does not indicate efficiency, as a lamp with lower wattage but poor light output would be less efficient: "Lower wattage must be paired with adequate lumens to improve efficiency" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.4: Lighting Calculations). Thus, more lumens/watt (Option A) describes a more efficient lamp.
Reference:EDGE User Guide Version 2.1, Section 4.4: Lighting Efficiency Measures; EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.4: Lighting Calculations.

質問 # 72
Energy consumption calculations in EDGE are based on:

A. Quasi-steady state calculations.
B. Steady state calculations.
C. Cooling and heating degree days.
D. Hourly simulation.

正解：B

解説：
The EDGE software uses a simplified approach to calculate energy consumption, focusing on accessibility and speed for users in emerging markets. The EDGE Methodology Report explains the calculation method:
"Energy consumption in EDGE is calculated using steady state calculations, which assume constant conditions over a period to estimate energy use for heating, cooling, lighting, and other systems. This method simplifies the modeling process while providing sufficiently accurate results for the purposes of EDGE certification" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.2: Energy Calculation Methods). Option B, steady state calculations, directly matches this approach. Option A (hourly simulation) is incorrect, as EDGE does not use dynamic simulations: "EDGE does not employ hourly simulations, which are more complex and resource-intensive, as the goal is to provide a fast and simple tool" (EDGE User Guide, Section 2.1: EDGE Software Overview). Option C (quasi-steady state calculations) is also incorrect, as EDGE does not use this intermediate method: "Quasi-steady state methods, which account for some dynamic effects, are not used in EDGE to maintain simplicity" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.2: Energy Calculation Methods). Option D (cooling and heating degree days) is a metric used to estimate climate impact, not the calculation method: "Degree days are inputs to the steady state calculations, not the method itself" (EDGE User Guide, Section 3.2: Climate Data Inputs). Thus, steady state calculations (Option B) are used for energy consumption in EDGE.
Reference:EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.2: Energy Calculation Methods; EDGE User Guide Version 2.1, Section 2.1: EDGE Software Overview, Section 3.2: Climate Data Inputs.

質問 # 73
Which of the following does NOT contribute to an EDGE Auditor maintaining their Auditor status?

A. Retaking the auditor exam.
B. Attending refresher training.
C. Studying the EDGE user guides as and when they are updated.
D. Performing at least one project site audit every two years.

正解：A

解説：
Maintaining EDGE Auditor status involves specific requirements to ensure ongoing competence. The EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols outline these requirements: "To maintain their status, EDGE Auditors must perform at least one project site audit every two years, attend refresher training as required by IFC, and stay updated by studying the EDGE user guides and protocols as they are revised" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 5.1: Maintaining Auditor Status). Option A (performing at least one project site audit every two years) is explicitly required to demonstrate active engagement. Option B (studying the EDGE user guides as updated) is also necessary to stay current with program changes. Option D (attending refresher training) is mandated to ensure continued education. However, Option C (retaking the auditor exam) is not a requirement for maintaining status: "Once certified, EDGE Auditors are not required to retake the exam to maintain their status, though they may need to retake it if their certification lapses or if significant program changes occur" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 5.2: Recertification Conditions). Since the question focuses on maintaining status, not recertification after lapse, retaking the exam is not a standard requirement. Thus, retaking the auditor exam (Option C) does not contribute to maintaining Auditor status.
Reference:EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 5.1: Maintaining Auditor Status, Section 5.2:
Recertification Conditions.

質問 # 74
......

我々Topexamが数年以来商品の開発をしている目的はIT業界でよく発展したい人にEDGEのEDGE-Expert試験に合格させることです。EDGEのEDGE-Expert試験のための資料がたくさんありますが、Topexamの提供するのは一番信頼できます。我々の提供するソフトを利用する人のほとんどは順調にEDGEのEDGE-Expert試験に合格しました。その中の一部は暇な時間だけでEDGEのEDGE-Expert試験を準備します。

EDGE-Expert練習問題集: https://www.topexam.jp/EDGE-Expert_shiken.html

EDGE-Expertの実践教材は、知識の理解の誤りを改善します、我々の試験問題を購入すると、EDGE-Expert試験問題集の合格率は99%に達しています、EDGE-Expertスタディガイドは、実践によって証明された候補者の大多数である最新の情報を提供します、Topexamは真実のEDGE EDGE-Expert認証試験の問題集が100%で君の試験の合格を保証します、EDGE EDGE-Expertリンクグローバル主な利点は次のとおりです、我々Topexamの自信は弊社の提供するEDGE-Expert模擬試験から得ています、多くの受験者は、当社の試験ブートキャンプ資料が有効であり、EDGE EDGE-Expert試験をクリアするのに十分であることを知っています、我々社のチームは顧客のすべてのために、改革政策に伴って最新版の信頼できるEDGEのEDGE-Expertをリリースされて喜んでいます。

辰巳さん何て言ってたっけ、うんちにいかせてぇっっ号泣寸前の絶叫に負けた、EDGE-Expertの実践教材は、知識の理解の誤りを改善します、我々の試験問題を購入すると、EDGE-Expert試験問題集の合格率は99%に達しています。

有難いEDGE-Expertリンクグローバル & 合格スムーズEDGE-Expert練習問題集 | 効果的なEDGE-Expert認定試験

EDGE-Expertスタディガイドは、実践によって証明された候補者の大多数である最新の情報を提供します、Topexamは真実のEDGE EDGE-Expert認証試験の問題集が100%で君の試験の合格を保証します、主な利点は次のとおりです。